Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00687
Original file (BC 2014 00687.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00687

			COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO 


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, Block 
18, Record of Service, be corrected to reflect his service in 
the Air Force.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His DD 214 has no entry of creditable service listed.  He 
petitioned to correct this error in 1975; however it was denied 
due to lack of discoverable evidence.

In support of his request, the applicant submits his DD Form 
214. 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 26 Oct 
73.

On 1 Nov 74, the applicant was furnished an Under Honorable 
Conditions discharge, and was credited with no active service. 
No narrative reason was listed on his DD Form 214 for discharge. 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.    


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIPV recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or an injustice.  The applicant enlisted into the Air 
Force and entered Active Duty on 26 Oct 73 and was discharged 
1 Nov 74, Under Honorable Conditions due to Fraudulent 
Enlistment.

In accordance with DoD Financial Management Regulation, Volume 
7A, Chapter 1, paragraph 010102A, the time served in an 
enlistment that is terminated, voided or invalidated as 
fraudulent is not creditable service.  Also, AFI 36-3202, 
Separation Documents, states in Table 2, Issuing DD Form 214, 
time spent in an enlistment that is determined to be fraudulent 
and has specifically terminated by reason of fraud is not 
creditable service.  The applicant was specifically discharged 
for fraudulent enlistment terminating his enlistment.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIPV evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 15 Sep 14 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion 
the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-00687 in Executive Session on 10 Feb 15 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 7 Feb 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIPV, dated 9 Apr 14.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 Sep 14.

						





Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01003

    Original file (BC 2014 01003.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01003 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive active duty credit for the period of time he spent in the Army National Guard (ANG) prior to enlisting in the Air Force. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05663

    Original file (BC 2013 05663.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05663 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation From Active Duty, effective 26 Sep 78, be changed to reflect his total active service dates as 11 Dec 71 through 26 Sep 78. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR),...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00403

    Original file (BC-2012-00403.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, he was not awarded the AFOR-ST, but qualifies for it based upon having served in Korea from May 73 to Nov 74. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of error or injustice. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05261

    Original file (BC 2013 05261.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05261 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Total Active Federal Military Service Date (TAFMSD) be changed from 21 Mar 89 to 13 Oct 87 to include credit for the time he spent in Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corp (AFROTC). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00887

    Original file (BC 2014 00887.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibit C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPV recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. There is no documentation in his record to reflect any military service prior to 17 Jul 42. After a thorough review of the applicant’s official military personnel record, they were...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00946

    Original file (BC 2013 00946.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00946 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected to reflect award of the Republic of Korea Presidential Unit Citation (RKPUC), the Vietnam Campaign Medal (VCM), and the Presidential Unit Citation with Valor (PUC w/Valor). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00946

    Original file (BC-2013-00946.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00946 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected to reflect award of the Republic of Korea Presidential Unit Citation (RKPUC), the Vietnam Campaign Medal (VCM), and the Presidential Unit Citation with Valor (PUC w/Valor). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00580

    Original file (BC 2014 00580.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for awards in support of Operation NICKEL GRASS. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting correction of the applicant’s records to reflect his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04523

    Original file (BC 2013 04523.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04523 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect that he was released from active duty on 22 Oct 64, instead of 22 May 64. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00108

    Original file (BC 2014 00108.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00108 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect: 1. His DD Form 214 should be corrected to reflect this period of time deployed to Thailand, as well as award of the AFOUA, the VSM w/P and the RVNGC w/V. No action required by the Board, as the applicant’s official...